Skip to main content

The Easiest Person to Fool

This week, I uncovered layers of nonsense interspersed with some good information. 

The Crappy Childhood Fairy on YouTube mentioned a book where she'd learned about tapping pressure points. I've used acupressure in the past and found some relief for a few different problems, so I looked up the book: The Body Keeps the Score by Bessel van der Kolk. It was a New York Times #1 best seller and has over 46,000 reviews on Amazon. 

Yet as I read it, various things leapt out as improbable: a child who didn't recognize himself in the mirror; psychological trauma in childhood resulting in a lack of neurological development in the brain; and finally the story of a man who suddenly "remembered" being molested by a priest.

Can that be right? Photo from Pexels.

In humans' 2 million year history, children must have gone through much more trauma than kids of the late 20th century, let alone the current crop. How could they have functioned as adults lacking neurological development? Likewise, how could stone-age humans have known what traumatizing dangers to avoid if they forgot about the trauma--particularly before humans could speak and pass on knowledge?

Clinical studies debunked so-called "recovered memories" years before The Body Keeps the Score came out. The book Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me) devotes an entire chapter to the subject, recalling the Satanic Panic of the 80s and 90s where innocent people spent long stretches in prison for "crimes" that therapists and counselors implanted in children's impressionable minds. "Experiencers" who sincerely believe they were abducted by space aliens illustrate the fallibility of memory. Even skeptic Michael Shermer imagined he had such an experience (but realized it was a hallucination due to exhaustion). Mistakes were Made mentions Bessel van der Kolk (the author of the previous book) and quotes his court testimony that he wasn't aware of disconfirming evidence of repressed memories. Other chapters recommend skepticism, the scientific method, seeing things from different points of view, and warn against self-justification. The book got a glowing review from Dr. Michael Eades of Protein Power back in 2008. 

The book was updated in 2019 with a chapter on two people with Trump Derangement Syndrome. They're worried he's dividing the country. They're frightened that he's a threat to democracy, that he'll start a war with Iran or even a civil war. They compare the US to 1930s Europe, comparing Trump to Mussolini, quoting Mein Kampf and warning that things under demagogues don't end well.  They demonize Trump and his supporters and believe anyone who would vote for him is probably too far gone to see reason. 

The two people with TDS are the authors, in the midst of a moral panic like the ones they write about. They don't realize it--or at least didn't at the time. They should have taken their friends' advice to scrap the chapter since politics is clearly outside their bailiwick judging by their wild fantasies. Not that they can't have a well-informed opinion about something they're not experts on, but I get the sense that they started with their conclusions and looked for (only) confirming evidence, which is the opposite of what scientists are supposed to do.

The easiest people to fool are academics (and journalists), as James Randi said. (All the authors of the books mentioned are academics.) Nassim Taleb went to pieces at the beginning of the pandemic, van der Kolk hasn't thought about evolution, and Mistakes were Made, But Not by Me, indeed. 

One good thing I got out of The Body Keeps the Score was the author's experience with concentration camp survivors. He noted many of them who came to America were successful, didn't like to talk about the camps, and most weren't interested in therapy. Maybe those three things are related. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What $115 Buys--Junk Food vs. Real Food

A lady recently went off about how little food $115 buys, complaining that the pile of (mostly) junk food she bought wouldn't make a week's worth of lunches and snacks for her children. Sad to say, but this looks like what I see in a lot of grocery carts.  Fat pic.twitter.com/qbM23ydaOq — shellshock (@shellshockkk) March 7, 2025 Coincidentally, I paid almost exactly the same amount today on groceries that would make lots of healthy lunches. It's filling food that won't leave you hungry every few hours for snacks. If we want to make America healthy again, this is the way.  

Celebrities Shilling for Big Soda

There's a push in Washington and ten states to ban soda (and other junk food) from SNAP, a program for low-income people to buy groceries. This seems like a no-brainer: the N in SNAP stands for nutrition, and soda doesn't have nutrients. It's liquid sugar, the last thing we need in a country full of diabetics. People can drink water for virtually nothing and save their SNAP money for actual food. Yet a number of posts from otherwise sensible accounts have opposed this.  Reporter Nick Sorter says that a company called Influenceable has been paying influencers to post these opinions. (Click on the link for the full thread.) 🚨🧵 EXPOSED: “INFLUENCEABLE” — The company cutting Big Checks to “influencers” on behalf of Big Soda Over the past 48 hours, several large supposedly MAGA-aligned “influencers” posted almost identical talking points fed to them, convincing you MAHA was out of line for not… pic.twitter.com/PpPwH9lHGe — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) March 22, 2025 Sorter adds...

$17/pound chips! Real food is cheaper

 My latest video on YouTube: Real food is generally cheaper than junk food--the pictures prove it. I took these at Kroger and from their website in March 2025. Prices are either straight from the tags or calculated based on product weight.  Music: On We Go (ClipChamp)  First photo by AS Photography: https://www.pexels.com/photo/vegetables-stall-868110/

Not Only Cheaper, But Easier

A while back, I wrote about saving money on break time coffee and snacks. I haven't done very well putting it into practice. But a post by James Clear today got me thinking about it again: Warren Buffett uses a two-list system to prioritize things. Check it out --and follow the instructions. Using Buffett's two-list system, two of the goals I ended up with were taking care of myself and saving $400 more per month than I already am. As I said, I've been wanting to save money, and the system made me really focus on this. I came up with 11 money-saving ideas, six of which had to do with food. Buying hamburger in bulk. Ranch Foods Direct sells one-pound packages of 80% lean pastured ground beef in bundles of 20 for a lot less than Whole Foods. Sprouts only carries super-lean beef that's grass-fed, and it's more expensive, too.  Not driving to Whole Foods. Whole Foods is out of my way, and saving a weekly trip saves gas. Coffee at home, tea at work. Tea is fr...

1972: Carole King, M*A*S*H and...Food for 2014?

I feel well enough to try Atkins induction again. The palpitations are gone, even without taking potassium. My energy level is back to normal--no more trucking on the treadmill early in the morning  to burn off nervous energy or emergency meat, cheese and mineral water stops after yoga. It's back to lounging around to Chopin and Debussy in the morning and stopping at the wine bar for pleasure. I'm using the original Atkins book: Dr. Atkins' Diet Revolution from 1972. While looking in the book for a way to make gelatin (which is allowed on induction, but Jello(TM) and products like it have questionable ingredients), I felt the earth move under my feet : those recipes from 42 years ago look delicious and they're mostly real food. It makes sense, though: the cooks who wrote the recipes probably didn't have had a palette used to low-fat food full of added sugar or a bag of tricks to make low-fat food edible. Anyone who writes a recipe called "Cottage Cheese and...