Skip to main content

The Easiest Person to Fool

This week, I uncovered layers of nonsense interspersed with some good information. 

The Crappy Childhood Fairy on YouTube mentioned a book where she'd learned about tapping pressure points. I've used acupressure in the past and found some relief for a few different problems, so I looked up the book: The Body Keeps the Score by Bessel van der Kolk. It was a New York Times #1 best seller and has over 46,000 reviews on Amazon. 

Yet as I read it, various things leapt out as improbable: a child who didn't recognize himself in the mirror; psychological trauma in childhood resulting in a lack of neurological development in the brain; and finally the story of a man who suddenly "remembered" being molested by a priest.

Can that be right? Photo from Pexels.

In humans' 2 million year history, children must have gone through much more trauma than kids of the late 20th century, let alone the current crop. How could they have functioned as adults lacking neurological development? Likewise, how could stone-age humans have known what traumatizing dangers to avoid if they forgot about the trauma--particularly before humans could speak and pass on knowledge?

Clinical studies debunked so-called "recovered memories" years before The Body Keeps the Score came out. The book Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me) devotes an entire chapter to the subject, recalling the Satanic Panic of the 80s and 90s where innocent people spent long stretches in prison for "crimes" that therapists and counselors implanted in children's impressionable minds. "Experiencers" who sincerely believe they were abducted by space aliens illustrate the fallibility of memory. Even skeptic Michael Shermer imagined he had such an experience (but realized it was a hallucination due to exhaustion). Mistakes were Made mentions Bessel van der Kolk (the author of the previous book) and quotes his court testimony that he wasn't aware of disconfirming evidence of repressed memories. Other chapters recommend skepticism, the scientific method, seeing things from different points of view, and warn against self-justification. The book got a glowing review from Dr. Michael Eades of Protein Power back in 2008. 

The book was updated in 2019 with a chapter on two people with Trump Derangement Syndrome. They're worried he's dividing the country. They're frightened that he's a threat to democracy, that he'll start a war with Iran or even a civil war. They compare the US to 1930s Europe, comparing Trump to Mussolini, quoting Mein Kampf and warning that things under demagogues don't end well.  They demonize Trump and his supporters and believe anyone who would vote for him is probably too far gone to see reason. 

The two people with TDS are the authors, in the midst of a moral panic like the ones they write about. They don't realize it--or at least didn't at the time. They should have taken their friends' advice to scrap the chapter since politics is clearly outside their bailiwick judging by their wild fantasies. Not that they can't have a well-informed opinion about something they're not experts on, but I get the sense that they started with their conclusions and looked for (only) confirming evidence, which is the opposite of what scientists are supposed to do.

The easiest people to fool are academics (and journalists), as James Randi said. (All the authors of the books mentioned are academics.) Nassim Taleb went to pieces at the beginning of the pandemic, van der Kolk hasn't thought about evolution, and Mistakes were Made, But Not by Me, indeed. 

One good thing I got out of The Body Keeps the Score was the author's experience with concentration camp survivors. He noted many of them who came to America were successful, didn't like to talk about the camps, and most weren't interested in therapy. Maybe those three things are related. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Moving on to YouTube

Remember when the blogosphere was a wild ride? Doctors, writers and researchers dove into research, picked apart studies and stood up to official advice and conventional wisdom that didn't work. We found each other in the comments and made a community.  Along the way, Dr. T. Colin Campbell's research got exposed as shoddy by an English major, Tom Naughton made us laugh, "safe starch" fads made us scratch our heads, "Diabetes Warrior" Steve Cooksey almost went to jail, CarbSane trolled everyone who was anyone, and CarbSaneR trolled the troll.  Now it's very quiet. Blogs don't come up in Google search results anymore and even if they did, most of the bloggers have stopped writing.  That's why I've moved on to YouTube. Videos do come up in search results and my shorts--which are mostly what I make--get pushed out to hundreds of people or more. My videos are on food and health (biohacking), but also on growing things and fixing things. If you...

We Hate the ADA; Why does the Perfect Health Diet Get a Pass?

Some people keep touting the Perfect Health Diet as low-carb, but carb levels that are mostly in the triple digits aren't generally regarded as low-carb; in fact, one of the authors says low-carb diets are unhealthy. A lot of us hate the  American Diabetes Association's advice for diabetics: start with 45g to 60g of carbohydrate per meal and go higher or lower from there. That's 135g to 180g of carb. Perfect Health Diet advice for diabetics: eat 20% to 30% of your diet as carbohydrate. On 2,000 calories, that's 100g to 150g of carb. On 1,700 calories, that's 85 to 128g; on 2,200 calories, that's 112 to 168g. Depending on your carb and calorie intake, carbs would be 85g to 168g per day. That's not a mile off from the ADA's recommendations. Paul Jaminet, one of the authors of the Perfect Health Diet, says, "the basic biology here is that the body's physiology is optimized for a carbohydrate intake of about 30%." He warns against a ...

Not Only Cheaper, But Easier

A while back, I wrote about saving money on break time coffee and snacks. I haven't done very well putting it into practice. But a post by James Clear today got me thinking about it again: Warren Buffett uses a two-list system to prioritize things. Check it out --and follow the instructions. Using Buffett's two-list system, two of the goals I ended up with were taking care of myself and saving $400 more per month than I already am. As I said, I've been wanting to save money, and the system made me really focus on this. I came up with 11 money-saving ideas, six of which had to do with food. Buying hamburger in bulk. Ranch Foods Direct sells one-pound packages of 80% lean pastured ground beef in bundles of 20 for a lot less than Whole Foods. Sprouts only carries super-lean beef that's grass-fed, and it's more expensive, too.  Not driving to Whole Foods. Whole Foods is out of my way, and saving a weekly trip saves gas. Coffee at home, tea at work. Tea is fr...

30-second Fix for a Cracked Stick Blender

Use Mighty Fixit (if you still have some from 2012) or Rescue Tape (which looks like a similar product) to fix a cracked stick blender. After I fixed the attachment, I washed it in the sink and the tape held up. I also wrapped a knife handle several years ago, and it's been through thousands of washings.

Doing Old-School Atkins

Last time I wrote about getting jittery and having a rapid heartbeat on VLC (very low carb). I cut way back on nuts a few weeks ago and felt remarkably better: more energy, and I can tell I lost a little weight because of the way my shoes and watchband fit. As I mentioned, taking a potassium pill helps the jitters and rapid heartbeat, and if it gets really bad, I can just eat a candy bar (we don't have safe starches at work). So for the first time, I tried Atkins induction. Why Atkins induction? It started with shorts. I'd been shopping for shorts and everything was very short (think Officer Jim Dangle on Reno 911 ), wildly patterned, ridiculous (where do you wear lace shorts if you're not starring in a Korean drama?) or knee length. There was even a high-waisted, pleated, acid washed pair from circa 1985. So when I saw a gray pair with sailor pant buttons, I bought them--even though they were pretty short (but not tight). Think Officer Dangle again. Being conscious of wea...