Skip to main content

Body for Life: What Went Wrong, Part 1

Some readers may know that I was a Body for Life enthusiast for six years. At age 33, I had no workout program, was a little on the fleshy side, and yet I was constantly hungry. A friend showed me a book called Body for Life (BFL) by Bill Phillips, and I was so impressed by the before and after photos that I tried the program. The plan consisted of eating six servings each of carbohydrates and proteins and two servings of green vegetables per day, plus six short but hard workouts per week. (A serving is the size of your fist.) I did, indeed, go down two dress sizes quickly and build muscle while eating more on BFL.

Four years later, I had recovered from a sprained neck and back from a car wreck and resumed BFL in earnest. But it stopped working, and by late 2009, I had put on 20 pounds of fat despite following the diet as well as I had before and being diligent about workouts.

Why did the same program produce different results at different times? This is the question I’ll explore in this post.

Why I think BFL worked, and then stopped working for me
I believe BFL worked for me initially because I was eating sufficient protein and lifting weights. The insulin released due to carb intake was used in building muscle. (Some weightlifters inject insulin to bulk up; I never did nor does BFL even mention the practice.) I believe that BFL stopped working for me because I was no longer building much muscle (I was lifting the maximum that my joints, not my muscles, would take) and because I was releasing more and more insulin, which increases appetite and sends more nutrients to the fat cells.

How metabolism changes
A person’s metabolism can change with time. The perfect example is diabetes II, formerly known as adult onset diabetes. Over time, the pancreas can lose its ability to produce enough insulin to handle excess blood sugar. Carbohydrate intake increases blood sugar, and insulin is released to send it to certain cells instead of leaving it in the bloodstream, where it can cause damage. High carb intake leads to lots of insulin, which can lead to the cells becoming insulin resistant, so the pancreas has to produce more and more insulin. When the pancreas cannot produce enough insulin, blood sugar levels remain too high, a condition called diabetes II. And the “lots of insulin” part causes some people to gain fat, which is why diabetics are often overweight. (People with diabetes I cannot produce insulin at all; therefore, they cannot gain fat without insulin injections.) You cannot get diabetes without certain genes; there are diabetics on both sides of my family.

Phillips himself says much the same thing about metabolism on p. 48:

Insulin is what I call a “nutrient-transport hormone.” It shuttles amino acids and glucose (blood sugar), among other things, into cells. But, when you eat too many carbs over a long period of time, your body becomes “insulin resistant,” and you can develop adult-onset diabetes, which can lead to obesity, heart disease, and a whole lot of other health problems, including unstable energy levels and fatigue. Eating a high-carb diet can also stimulate the appetite and cause unfavorable and unpredictable mood swings (especially in the midafternoon). Moreover, whenever insulin levels are elevated, your body will not burn fat....The solution is to balance carbohydrate and protein intake.

Stimulated appetite, not burning fat, and according to some coworkers, unpredictable mood swings (or "being unhelpful") was exactly what happened to me. So how does it follow that the solution is to balance carbohydrate and protein? I'll address that in my next post.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Blog Lineup Change

Bye-bye, Fathead. I've enjoyed the blog, but can't endorse the high-fat, high-carb Perfect Health Diet that somehow makes so much sense to some otherwise bright people. An astrophysicist makes some rookie mistakes on a LC diet, misdiagnoses them, makes up "glucose deficiency," and creates a diet that's been shown in intervention studies to increase small LDL, which can lead to heart disease. A computer programmer believes in the diet and doesn't seem eager to refute it because, perhaps, scientists are freakin' liars and while he's good at spotting logical inconsistencies, lacks some intermediate knowledge of human biology. To Tom's credit, he says it's not the right diet for everyone, but given the truckload of food that has to be prepared and eaten, impracticality of following it while traveling (or even not traveling), and unsuitability for FODMAPs sufferers, diabetics and anyone prone to heart disease (i.e., much of the population), I'm...

1972: Carole King, M*A*S*H and...Food for 2014?

I feel well enough to try Atkins induction again. The palpitations are gone, even without taking potassium. My energy level is back to normal--no more trucking on the treadmill early in the morning  to burn off nervous energy or emergency meat, cheese and mineral water stops after yoga. It's back to lounging around to Chopin and Debussy in the morning and stopping at the wine bar for pleasure. I'm using the original Atkins book: Dr. Atkins' Diet Revolution from 1972. While looking in the book for a way to make gelatin (which is allowed on induction, but Jello(TM) and products like it have questionable ingredients), I felt the earth move under my feet : those recipes from 42 years ago look delicious and they're mostly real food. It makes sense, though: the cooks who wrote the recipes probably didn't have had a palette used to low-fat food full of added sugar or a bag of tricks to make low-fat food edible. Anyone who writes a recipe called "Cottage Cheese and...

My Long-Term Experience Eating Safe (and Other) Starches

Years ago, before the Perfect Health Diet came out, I followed a program that involved eating quite a bit "safe starch." It was called Body for Life. It involved eating six small servings of carbohydrate along with six small servings of protein, plus two servings of fibrous vegetables per day. (A serving was the size of your fist or the palm of your hand.) There were six workouts a week (three weightlifting, three cardio) and one free day every week where you ate whatever you wanted and didn't exercise. In all fairness, these two programs are different: BFL allows certain grains, legumes and low-fat dairy and discourages fat. It doesn't call for a wheelbarrow full of vegetation. Nevertheless, my experience eating lots of fruit and lots of starch is relevant to the PHD because the amount and type of digestible carbohydrates are similar, and for the first few years, I didn't eat wheat except on free days. At first on BFL, I felt great. Before, I was continually...