Skip to main content

The Ivermectin Muddle

A number of stories on ivermectin, both for and against, have turned out to be false or at least unverifiable.  An Oklahoma hospital wasn't flooded with any patients with complications from ivermectin, Mississippi's poison control center was not inundated with calls from people who'd overdosed on ivermectin, and the "spike" in calls to Kentucky's poison control center consisted of 13 calls. Yes, the first retraction begins, "One Oklahoma hospital denies..." but it can't be that hard for professional journalists to identify which rural hospital had multiple shooting victims AND an ER full of ivermectin overdoses. Even in Indianapolis, multiple shooting victims make the news. It's tempting to blame the gullibility on people who've never set foot in flyover country (except for Chicago), but Kentucky's governor is going on about the "horse dewormer craze" and the Oklahoma TV station that ran the horse-meds-at-the-OK-Corral story still has it up without a retraction. BTW, none of these stories has been marked as misinformation on Twitter. 

As James Randi said, academics and reporters are gullible.

On the other side, we have an ivermectin study whose author has not provided his data upon request from a couple of other scientists. Apparently, it's standard practice for scientists to share data, so this makes the study suspect. We also have other studies being retracted or not published. I have no idea whether the journals doing this are acting appropriately or not. Studies get retracted all the time and much of what's published in journals is false according to a former editor of a medical journal. 

I'm not a medical professional, I don't have any inside information on this research, and I have only a layman's knowledge of viruses. People I'd normally look to for expertise have not, to the best of my knowledge, expressed an opinion on ivermectin. A few people who would be talking up ivermectin if they believed it worked--Sen. Rand Paul (an MD) and Eric Weinstein (brother of Bret Weinstein, who has looked into ivermectin and thinks it works) have said they don't know what to make of it. I don't know what to make of it, either. 

The clinical experience people have described seems promising, but I've seen promising results and enthusiasm before among some very smart people for things that didn't work out:

  • Safe starches. They're still starches and they can still raise your blood sugar and make you store fat.
  • Chronic keto. Not good for your gut bacteria.

In my lifetime, we've had smart, well-intentioned people tell us to take aspirin to prevent heart disease (doesn't work; it can make your stomach bleed); put babies to sleep on their bellies (causes SIDS); and give out supplemental estrogen like candy (harms generally outweigh benefits). I've lived through moral panics, too, which we're in now: we had the Satanic panic in the 80s and the recovered memories sham in the 90s, now debunked, but the recovered memories sham put innocent people in prison. UFOs were a thing, too. In 1980, the CBS affiliate in Denver produced and aired a program called Strange Harvest that blamed cattle mutilations on aliens--the outer space kind, not aliens coming up from Mexico who might have wanted to scare off ranchers and be left alone. Smart people can sincerely believe things that turn out to be absurd.

In ten years, we'll probably know whether ivermectin is a wonder drug for COVID or a placebo.

What I'm doing is using redundancy in case any one tactic doesn't work. 

  • Normalize vitamin D (supplement and test)
  • Eat specially made yogurt and prebiotic fibers
  • Avoid high blood sugar
  • Avoid weight gain--limit carbs, weigh myself daily
  • Avoid indoor crowds, even if people are vaccinated or tested (vaccinated people can spread COVID)
  • Stay off of ships and other petri dishes (which I do anyway)
  • Stay home and rest if I get sick
  • If a doctor prescribed ivermectin, I would take it at the recommended dose
  • Request monoclonal antibodies for a bad case (even though I don't have high risk factors)


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Long-Term Experience Eating Safe (and Other) Starches

Years ago, before the Perfect Health Diet came out, I followed a program that involved eating quite a bit "safe starch." It was called Body for Life. It involved eating six small servings of carbohydrate along with six small servings of protein, plus two servings of fibrous vegetables per day. (A serving was the size of your fist or the palm of your hand.) There were six workouts a week (three weightlifting, three cardio) and one free day every week where you ate whatever you wanted and didn't exercise. In all fairness, these two programs are different: BFL allows certain grains, legumes and low-fat dairy and discourages fat. It doesn't call for a wheelbarrow full of vegetation. Nevertheless, my experience eating lots of fruit and lots of starch is relevant to the PHD because the amount and type of digestible carbohydrates are similar, and for the first few years, I didn't eat wheat except on free days. At first on BFL, I felt great. Before, I was continually...
17 comments
Read more

Blog Lineup Change

Bye-bye, Fathead. I've enjoyed the blog, but can't endorse the high-fat, high-carb Perfect Health Diet that somehow makes so much sense to some otherwise bright people. An astrophysicist makes some rookie mistakes on a LC diet, misdiagnoses them, makes up "glucose deficiency," and creates a diet that's been shown in intervention studies to increase small LDL, which can lead to heart disease. A computer programmer believes in the diet and doesn't seem eager to refute it because, perhaps, scientists are freakin' liars and while he's good at spotting logical inconsistencies, lacks some intermediate knowledge of human biology. To Tom's credit, he says it's not the right diet for everyone, but given the truckload of food that has to be prepared and eaten, impracticality of following it while traveling (or even not traveling), and unsuitability for FODMAPs sufferers, diabetics and anyone prone to heart disease (i.e., much of the population), I'm...
24 comments
Read more

Carrageenan: A Sickening Thickener. Is it a Migraine Menace?

Let me tell you about my ride in an ambulance last night. I woke up at six o'clock from a nap with a mild headache. I ate dinner and took my vitamins, along with a couple of extra magnesium pills. Since magnesium helps my TMJ flare-ups, I thought it might help my headache. Then I went to see my mother. A few hours later, I had a severe headache, sinus pain and nausea. During a brief respite from the pain, I left for home, but less than a mile later, I got out of my car and threw up. A cop, Officer Fisher, pulled up behind me and asked if I was okay. He believed me when he said I hadn't been drinking, but he said I seemed lethargic and he wanted the paramedics to see me. (Later he mentioned that a man he'd recently stopped was having a stroke.) Thinking I had a migraine headache, the paramedics wanted to take me to the hospital. But since I knew that doctors don't know what causes migraine headaches, and I didn't know what effect their medicine would have on m...
15 comments
Read more