Skip to main content

A Reason to Eat Red Meat, Fat, Eggs and Salt

It looks like Reason magazine has been reading about my diet...or maybe just studies showing no associations between red meat and mortality, saturated fat and heart disease, stroke or cardiovascular disease, or salt consumption and disease. Summarizing published research from the past few years, the article calls the government's dietary advice of the past forty years a fiasco of misinformation,  even noting there's a positive association between a low-sodium diet and death. It adds that the US government's Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee has dropped their long crusade against cholesterol.

The article explains,

Observational studies [which the government relied on] may be good at developing hypotheses, but they are mostly not a good basis for making behavioral recommendations and imposing regulations.

It's refreshing for the mainstream media to recognize that mainstream dietary advice hasn't been working instead of parroting the same misinformation. The comments section of the article is happily free of the usual vegan trolls, too: Reason is libertarian (a way of thinking that doesn't draw many vegans) and commenting requires registration.

See "The Red Meat, Eggs, Fat, and Salt Diet" by Ronald Bailey, Reason magazine's Hit & Run Blog, February 24, 2015. 

Comments

FogDog said…
When I think of misinformation I think of intentional actions. As a mechanical engineer I'm sure you understand how the same data can be viewed multiple ways. I really don't think anyone intentionally misled the public, I just think a lot of studies are flawed and open to interpretation and you never know what will resonate with the public and what won't.

Remember, over the years there have beena lot of food "villians" - Fat, Cholestoral, HFCS, and Carbs just to name a few. Nowadays Gluten and Sugar seem to be in the spotlight and I can find studies that support and refute all of these things.

-FogDog Weight Loss
Lori Miller said…
Nutrition research is full of magic tricks to yield the conclusions the researchers want: LC studies that aren't long enough for adaptation, LC studies that aren't really LC (>180g/day), and at least one involving wheat where the control was dairy protein, something that wheat intolerant people tend to also be intolerant to. Then there's statistical shenanigans. Then there's just saying what you want to say regardless of the actual conclusions.

Yes, data can be viewed in different ways, but all we heard about until a few years ago was the evils of fat, when the evils of carbs were lurking there.
Gwen said…
As long as this great nation requires wheat and corn farmers (and it always will)...the government cannot afford to bankrupt itself by admitting that wheat and corn is toxic to humans. It's a matter of simple economics, sadly.
Lori Miller said…
Why would the US require as many wheat and corn farmers if there were less of a demand for the stuff?
Lori Miller said…
If you mean from loss of tax revenue, the government will face a huge burden of medical costs of illnesses (especially diabetes among Baby Boomers) if they don't change their recommendations. Besides, wheat and corn farmers will do something else with their land if their current business isn't profitable enough: raising livestock, growing other crops, or starting a wind farm where trees grow diagonally.
Well I love eating meat, fish, poultry, fat, eggs, non starchy vegetables, everything LCHF and will continue to do so.

Farmers unite and grow more great whole real foods for the population to enjoy .........

All the best Jan
Lori Miller said…
Hear, hear! Better food, better health, fewer subsidies, and where animals start grazing and foraging again, it's better for the land.
FogDog said…
Yes, data can be viewed in different ways, but all we heard about until a few years ago was the evils of fat, when the evils of carbs were lurking there.

True indeed, but at the time I don't believe the public was intentionally being misled. Fat just had a lousy PR agent. Finally it fired the agent and he moved on to represent carbs.

Additionally, most people suffer from confirmation bias including scientists who first concluded fat was bad. From there on subsequent studies just supported what they already believed.

20 Years from now people will be screaming about how the evils of of corn starch were clear in 2015 but everyone was too focused on carbs or better yet someone will discover that eggs were bad after all and we'll start all over again..

-FogDogWeightLoss.Blogspot.com
Lori Miller said…
Actually, the studies didn't support what they already believed. (Read some of the links in the Reason article.) Neither did evolution, endocrinology textbooks or common experience. But they persisted, probably not with the intention of deceiving the public, but with making a living. Neither that nor confirmation bias, which scientists are supposed to take into account, were an excuse for their intellectual prostitution. If you think I'm being harsh, look up Barnard and Cambell on my blog or "low carb scare studies" over at the Diabetes Update blog in my blogroll.

You mentioned mechanical engineering. My thermodynamics professor said to us, "Concepts are fine, but if you can't get the right answer, you're no use to anyone." The researchers, politicians, and industry flacks who pushed low-fat diets were worse than useless.
Galina L. said…
I do feel very negatively about vegetarianism, and so many people are victims.
Lori Miller said…
If a person enjoys a vegetarian diet and feels good on it, that's fine with me. What I don't like is some proponents of veganism are out-and-out dishonest. If it's so great, why make things up?
Galina L. said…
I keep coming across the people who follow vegetarianism because they BELIEVE it is a healthy choice or pressured by their social circle while being blind to what it is doing to them.I am thinking at the moment about my favorite yoga teacher. She is 5 years younger than me - 49, I know her for longer than 10 years, and I can observe what that "enjoyment" looks like.
Lori Miller said…
That's true--some people don't connect their diet to their health problems. I've heard some people say that they had some mysterious health problem and their doctor said it was a good thing their diet was so healthy, or they'd be a lot sicker. Turned out the problem WAS their diet.
Galina L. said…
It is the case with my yoga teacher - she is very health-oriented, don't eat sweets and cooks her food, but her extremely tired face all the time (not explained by a busy life), mysterious numerous illnesses and energy problems are the marks that she is not thriving at all.
Lori Miller said…
If she's really into Indian culture or spirituality, it might be hard for her to accept that ditching her brown rice and lentils for a bunless cheeseburger could solve her problems.
Galina L. said…
It is hard to ditch believes for many people.
Lori Miller said…
Especially if the beliefs are based on feelings.

Popular posts from this blog

My New Favorite Sweetener

If you're looking for a low-carb sweetener with no aftertaste, no franken-ingredients, and that doesn't upset your stomach, try monk fruit (also known as luo han guo). This is what Quest bars were sweetened with when they first came out. Monk fruit is Dr. Davis approved. You can buy monk fruit in powdered or liquid form; both are super-concentrated. They might seem expensive, but you use the powder by the spoonful (even in baking recipes) and the liquid by the drop. The baking recipes I've made with the powder have turned out well. Available from Amazon . Beware monk fruit sweeteners with erythritol.  The package of powdered monk fruit sweetener I bought says, "Use 1/8 teaspoon to create the same sweet taste as 1 teaspoon of sugar." But it's so sweet that I use 1/10 the amount. To replace a cup of sugar, I would use 5 teaspoons of monk fruit sweetener. Tip: hand-stir this in before using the beaters. It's such a fine powder that it flies up and out of the ...

Mince Meat Pie Recipe, low carb

The star of Christmas dinner this year was made of unlikely ingredients. Fruit and beef tongue sound high carb or unpalatable, but mince meat pie was so popular 250 years ago that it was in many cookbooks from the time--and it wasn't just for Christmas. My version cuts the carbs by using tart cooking apples, cranberries, monk fruit sweetener and a nut flour crust. The main flavors are orange and slightly tart fruit; the meat and fat make it filling. Have it for dessert or with coffee or tea for breakfast. Make some soup with the collagen-filled broth and discover how tender and tasty the rest of the beef tongue is. Worth the time and effort. IMPORTANT--start this recipe the day before. Links in the recipe go to hard-to-find ingredients and directly to the cookbook with the recipe for the pie crust. (I made the almond flour variation of the crust.) Recipe 1 beef tongue (I get mine here ; look for farms or ranches in your area that sell directly to consumers) 2 Granny Smith apples 1 ...

Is the NIH Privately Helping Patients with COVID Vax Injuries?

In a recent letter from several attorneys general (AGs) demanding an explanation as to why so few vaccine-injured people have received so little compensation, the AGs asked a curious question: We have been told by constituents that NIH [National Institutes of Health] is privately helping patients across the country with COVID-19 vaccine–related injuries and is even bringing patients to NIH for study and treatment. Is that correct? Why have these activities not been better publicized? What sorts of studies of these patients is NIH currently conducting? What treatments is NIH administering? Photo from Pixabay . Most of the letter focused on compensation for COVID-19 vaccine injuries. As you know, vaccine manufacturers in the US have immunity from lawsuits, but people suffering from vaccine injuries can be compensated by the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP). But among the 10,000 COVID vaccine related claims, only 20 claimants have received compensation. "And but for...

Magnesium Tea: Peachy, Minty, Refreshing

Most readers know that magnesium supplementation is important, especially on low-carb diets. Magnesium deficiency is common, and low-carb diets require more magnesium--a mineral that's important for heart, muscle and digestive function and helps regulate blood sugar.  Photo from Unsplash . The magnesium powder in this recipe is the best form I've found--I had a lot of trouble with magnesium supplements during the pandemic not working, or giving me diarrhea, or (in the case of all the milk of magnesia) being contaminated with bleach. This magnesium powder doesn't require a carbonation machine, unlike some other powders. The peach flavor is only mildly sweet.  Note--limit servings to two per day, preferably spaced out several hours apart. Too much magnesium at once can have a laxative effect.  4-5 mint tea bags filtered water (enough for 1 medium pitcher) Doctor's Best magnesium powder, peach flavor Boil a cup of the water and add tea bags. Let steep for five minutes. Add...

How would Dr. Oz Treat the DTs?

"You let me in your house with a hammer." -"Candy Shop" by Andrew Bird Low-carb proponent Gary Taubes appeared on the Dr. Oz Show March 7. In one entertaining segment, Dr. Oz spent a day eating a low-carb diet and complained of the greasiness of the sausage, feeling tired, constipation and bad breath. That's a drag, but when I stopped drinking Coke in 2007, I felt even worse: stomach ache, headache, tiredness, and mental fog. Should I have gone back to drinking Coke? If you quit a bad alcohol habit and start seeing snakes, do you need a drink? If my legs hurt from working out Monday night for the first time in two months (which they do), maybe I should resume my exercise hiatus indefinitely. I respect Dr. Oz for having Gary Taubes on his show and letting him share his ideas. I'd respect Oz even more if he looked into low-carb diets more carefully. What he didn't seem to consider regarding his one-day low-carb diet was that he spent a day...