Skip to main content

Vaccine Hesitancy and Odds of Going to the Hospital

In the great push to get everybody jabbed with the experimental COVID vaccine, people in the wait-and-see camp have been painted as conspiracy theorists and anti-science morons--the sort of people you'd see at the recent Redneck Rave where 15,000 people came and some ended up impaled, choked or badly cut. Dozens were charged with crimes. Won't it be interesting to see Edmonson County, Kentucky's COVID stats in a few weeks. Surely the local hospital will be full of rednecks, and not just to have fingers sewn back on...right?

Use this, plus your region's dashboard, to calculate your odds. Photo from Pixabay.

Maybe not. Humans are inherently bad at estimating odds. Several news outlets report that 99% of COVID patients in the hospital are unvaccinated, so does that mean you're almost a hundred times more likely to end up in the hospital if you haven't had your shots? Not quite. Looking only at hospitalized people rather than the whole population is relative risk. The relative risk reduction of symptomatic cases in the vaccine trials ranged from about 70% to 95%, which isn't that far off from what the news reports about COVID cases in hospitals. But if you don't currently have COVID, you're probably more interested in your absolute risk. The vaccine manufacturers' own trials showed only about a 1% reduction in absolute risk of getting symptomatic COVID. In other words, for study group of 200 (100 who get the vaccines and 100 who get a placebo), only 1 more person in the placebo (control) group would get sick. 

We can calculate real-world absolute risk reduction of being hospitalized with COVID here in Indiana--which is next door to Kentucky, coincidentally. Close to three million people out of 6.5 million are fully vaccinated. Around 40 people per day are being admitted to the hospital for COVID, according to our dashboard. If we extrapolate that to two months (the length of the vaccine studies), that amounts to 24 vaccinated people and 2,376 unvaccinated people ending up in the hospital. Dividing by 3 million and 3.5 million, respectively, and subtracting the results gives us a difference of 671 per million. That's less than one in a thousand. Looking at it another way, you'd have to vaccinate 1,500 people to prevent one hospitalization over the next two months.

So why the higher rate of unvaccinated people in the hospital than what showed up in the studies? A couple of possible reasons. The studies looked at symptomatic COVID cases, not hospitalizations. Then there's the healthy user effect. People taking the vaccines might also be taking other steps to reduce their risk of getting COVID. Another is socioeconomics. Some researchers from the University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University conducted a survey on vaccine hesitancy. Here's something they found:

Workers in some occupations were more reluctant than others to take the jab. Hesitancy ranged from 9.6% among educators and people in life, physical or social sciences to a high of 46% among workers in construction, oil and gas extraction and mining. Hesitancy was nearly as high among workers in installation, maintenance, repair, farming, fishing or forestry.

In health care fields, pharmacists were the least hesitant at 8.5%. The highest hesitancy, 20.5%, was among medical assistants, emergency medical technicians and home health, nursing, psychiatric or personal-care aides.

The highest portion of the vaccine hesitant was among people who can't Zoom into work for one thing. The have to show up and in some cases have close contact with people. For another, they're in physically demanding jobs that might put them around unhealthy chemicals--and the human body has a limited ability to repair itself. And my experience (my father worked construction) is that blue-collar people are less fussy about what they eat and whether they smoke than desk jockeys are. Again, it's the healthy user effect. These things might make people more likely to contract and get ill from COVID.

There's an impression that the hesitant believe in wild stories like microchips in the vaccines or that they simply don't want to be told what to do. But the study found that the main concern was side effects. Many of the unjabbed are people in dangerous jobs where things absolutely, positively have to work in the real world--and they've found that recommendations from faraway bureaucrats or plans designed in an office don't always meet that standard. A push by faraway bureaucrats to vaccinate everyone with an experimental vaccine rushed through trials conducted by the vendors sounds like just the sort of thing to give them pause. 

To be fair, my calculation of absolute risk reduction doesn't take herd immunity into consideration. Vaccinations are one way to get to herd immunity--but so is an event like the Redneck Rave. So I'd like to thank all the rednecks who attended, got exposed to COVID, and hopefully developed some immunity to it during summer, when they're less likely to end up in the hospital. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Winning! Read some good news!

The good news keeps on coming. After four years of the country being in the biggest mess that most of us have lived through, it feels like spring is here early. The cold wind is refreshing, the snow is sparkling, and the days are getting longer.  Photo from Pixabay . If you're getting this post by email, click here to see embedded videos from X. Trump bans the chemical and surgical mutilation of children in the name of "gender affirming care."  This is just an executive order, which the next president could overturn; we need Congress to pass a law. The CIA admits COVID was mostly likely a lab leak after all. "The CIA analysis supporting lab origin of COVID was completed and published internally during the Biden administration. It was withheld from the public by the Biden Administration in violation of the COVID-19 Origin Act of 2023, which mandated release," said Richard H. Ebright on X.  The CIA now says lab leak is the most likely explanation for COVID-19. R...

Not Only Cheaper, But Easier

A while back, I wrote about saving money on break time coffee and snacks. I haven't done very well putting it into practice. But a post by James Clear today got me thinking about it again: Warren Buffett uses a two-list system to prioritize things. Check it out --and follow the instructions. Using Buffett's two-list system, two of the goals I ended up with were taking care of myself and saving $400 more per month than I already am. As I said, I've been wanting to save money, and the system made me really focus on this. I came up with 11 money-saving ideas, six of which had to do with food. Buying hamburger in bulk. Ranch Foods Direct sells one-pound packages of 80% lean pastured ground beef in bundles of 20 for a lot less than Whole Foods. Sprouts only carries super-lean beef that's grass-fed, and it's more expensive, too.  Not driving to Whole Foods. Whole Foods is out of my way, and saving a weekly trip saves gas. Coffee at home, tea at work. Tea is fr...

Let's Grow Vegetables from Seed

MAHA may be a great idea, but what you do at your house is more important for your health than what's happening at the White House. Growing your own vegetables provides food that's fresher and tastes better than store-bought and helps you get some fresh air, sunshine and exercise. If you grow enough, you can even can your own sauces and soups that don't have any franken-food ingredients. My first time growing celery from seed.  Here in central Indiana, it's time to plant celery from seed since the average last frost date is 10 weeks away. In a few weeks, it'll be time to plant tomatoes. There are a couple of ways to figure out when to start various seeds where you live: You can find out when it's time to plant things by 1) looking up your average last frost date, 2) getting a seed packet and looking at the instructions for starting the seeds indoors, and 3) counting backwards on a calendar by the number of weeks indicated. You could also ask Grok (X's AI fea...

Blog Lineup Change

Bye-bye, Fathead. I've enjoyed the blog, but can't endorse the high-fat, high-carb Perfect Health Diet that somehow makes so much sense to some otherwise bright people. An astrophysicist makes some rookie mistakes on a LC diet, misdiagnoses them, makes up "glucose deficiency," and creates a diet that's been shown in intervention studies to increase small LDL, which can lead to heart disease. A computer programmer believes in the diet and doesn't seem eager to refute it because, perhaps, scientists are freakin' liars and while he's good at spotting logical inconsistencies, lacks some intermediate knowledge of human biology. To Tom's credit, he says it's not the right diet for everyone, but given the truckload of food that has to be prepared and eaten, impracticality of following it while traveling (or even not traveling), and unsuitability for FODMAPs sufferers, diabetics and anyone prone to heart disease (i.e., much of the population), I'm...

This Just In: Yogurt Doesn't Improve Health

A recent study from Spain finds "In comparison with people that did not eat yogurt, those who ate this dairy product regularly did not display any significant improvement in their score on the physical component of quality of life, and although there was a slight improvement mentally, this was not statistically significant," states López-García. Most yogurt is pretty much pudding with a little bacteria . Pudding is a sugar bomb. Hard to believe the stuff doesn't improve health outcomes, isn't it? But as usual, researchers are calling for...more research. "For future research more specific instruments must be used which may increase the probability of finding a potential benefit of this food."